The new-generation Ford Everest has generated a ton of buzz. It’s upgraded and enhanced, but the fact some variants are offered with a V6 engine has set pulses racing the most.
Our test vehicle, the Sport variant, sits just under the top-shelf Platinum variant in the Everest line-up, and it has the 3.0-litreturbo-diesel V6 engine that everyone is so terribly excited about.
It also has great potential as a family vehicle and a recreational tourer, but, while that’s all well and good, we wanted to test how it performs off-road.
In order to find out, we pitted it against two well-equipped and very popular range-topping seven-seat 4WD wagons – the Isuzu MU-X in LS-T spec, and the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in GSR spec – and drove all of these ute-based vehicles over the same 4WD-only terrain in the same conditions.
This comparison is about 4WD capability, pure and simple, and our off-road test reveals plenty of very interesting factors – positive and negative – about each vehicle.
Price and features – Does these represent good value for the price? What features do they come with?
The Ford Everest Sport is available as a 4WD wagon with a 3.0-litre turbo-diesel V6 engine or a rear-wheel drive wagon with a 2.0-litre four-cylinder twin-turbo – both have a 10-speed automatic transmission. Our test vehicle has the V6 engine. It has selectable 4WD with a 4A (4WD Auto) mode.
The V6 variant has a manufacturer suggested retail price of $69,590, before on-road costs, but our test vehicle was equipped with the Touring Pack ($2300), Towing Pack ($1700) and it has prestige paint ('Sedona Orange', $700).
If you’d prefer a more off-road-suited wheel-and-tyre combination, you can choose the 18-inch black alloys on All-Terrain tyres as no-cost options.
Exterior paint jobs include the no-cost 'Arctic White', or choose from 'Meteor Grey', 'Aluminium Silver', 'Blue Lightning', Sedona Orange (our test vehicle’s paint), 'Equinox Bronze' and 'Shadow Black' – each costing $700 a pop.
The Isuzu MU-X LS-T is $69,488 including all options and on-road costs, and that’s an Isuzu-provided drive-away price that’s correct at time of writing.
The Isuzu MU-X LS-T is $69,488 including all options and on-road costs (drive away). (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Upfront of the MU-X is a 9.0-inch multimedia display. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
It is the top-shelf variant in the three-variant MU-X line-up.
Optional extras on our test vehicle include tow bar kit ($1182.25), 12-pin plug ($393.25), electronic brake controller ($896.05), rubber mats ($241.67) and premium paint ('Galaxy Blue Mica', $650.)
The MU-X has a 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, a six-speed automatic transmission, and a part-time four-wheel drive system.
Standard features include a 9.0-inch multimedia display with sat-nav, Android Auto and wireless Apple CarPlay, an eight-speaker sound system, remote engine start, smart entry and start, and new 20-inch six-spoke machined-alloy wheels on 265/60R20 Bridgestone 684II HT tyres.
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GSR has a MSRP starting from $62,440 (excluding on-road costs). (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Upfront of the Pajero Sport is an 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The most recent round of updates to the LS-T included a new grille design across the range, revised LED tail-light surrounds, and a new auto-off feature for blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert systems when towing.
Exterior paint jobs include 'Mineral White', 'Mercury Silver Metallic', 'Obsidian Grey Mica', 'Basalt Black Mica', 'Magnetic Red Mica', 'Cobalt Blue Mica', 'Moonstone White Pearl' and the new Galaxy Blue Mica (on our test vehicle).
Note: the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GSR provided to us for this test was a 22MY (model year) vehicle; the prices (listed below, including accessories) are applicable to a 23MY vehicle.
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GSR has a manufacturer suggested retail price (MSRP) of $62,440 (excluding on-road costs), but our test vehicle was fitted with a bunch of accessories including Redarc Electric brake controller with harness ($689), a towbar kit with 12-pin plug ($1555), carpet mat set ($236), a 50mm chrome towball ($41), so if it were a 23MY vehicle its total MSRP would be $64,961.
Our test vehicles come in Galaxy Blue Mica (MU-X), Sedona Orange (Everest) and Black Mica (Pajero Sport). (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Standard features include an 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system (with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), paddle shifters on the steering wheel, leather-appointed seats, power-adjustable and heated front seats, LED daytime running lights, 'Multi Around Monitor', dual zone climate control, 18-inch black alloy wheels and a power tailgate.
The Pajero Sport has 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, an eight-speed automatic transmission, and a four-wheel drive system (Super Select II 4WD) that enables it to be driven in full-time 4WD, even on high-traction surfaces.
Exterior paint jobs for the GSR include 'Black Mica' (pearlescent, on our test vehicle), 'Terra Rosa' (pearlescent) and 'White Diamond' (prestige).
Under the bonnet – What are the key stats for their engines and transmissions?
The Everest Sport’s V6 is top of this trio in terms of sheer power and torque.
The 3.0-litre turbo-diesel V6 produces 184kW at 3250rpm and 600Nm from 1750rpm-2250rpm, putting the Everest well ahead of the MU-X LS-T (140kW at 3600rpm and 450Nm at 1600-2600rpm) and the Pajero Sport (133kW at 3500rpm and 430Nm at 2500rpm).
Model
Power
Torque
Ford Everest Sport
184kW
600Nm
Isuzu MU-X LS-T
140kW
450Nm
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GSR
133kW
430Nm
In terms of sheer power and torque, the Everest Sport comes out on top. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
But will the V6’s figures translate to real-world terrain-conquering prowess? No spoilers here, you’ll have to read on.
For those people who are cross-shopping within the Everest range, the V6 Everest’s impressive power and torque figures also give it a clear 30kW/100Nm advantage over its 2.0-litre four-cylinder 'bi-turbo'-powered stablemates.
The Everest has the 10-speed automatic transmission and a 4WD system with selectable two-wheel drive (2H), four-wheel drive high-range (4H), four-wheel drive low-range (4L) and four-wheel drive automatic (4A = 4Auto) that sends drive to the front and rear axles as needed, and which can be used on high-traction surfaces. It has a locking rear diff.
Under the Everest Sport’s bonnet is a 3.0-litre turbo-diesel V6. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The Everest also has a variety of selectable drive modes including Normal, Eco, Tow Haul, Slippery, and for off-roading: Mud/Ruts, and Sand.
The MU-X has the line-up’s reliably gutsy 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, and a six-speed auto transmission. This is a proven and generally unstressed combination.
The MU-X’s engine is not the torquiest on the market, but there is ample pulling power available across a broad rev range and it delivers that torque in such an even-handed fashion that it more than makes up for a lack of gargantuan Newton metres.
Under the MU-X LS-T's bonnet is a 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The MU-X has a part-time 4WD system. It has a dual-range transfer case (with high- and low-range 4WD), and a rear diff-lock. The driver is able to shift from 2H (two-wheel drive, high range) to 4H (4WD high range) while on the move, and up to speeds of 100km/h,
The diff-lock may only be engaged when the vehicle is in 4L (4WD low range).
It also has a switchable terrain mode system, which tweaks the engine, transmission and off-road traction control to suit the terrain.
Under the Pajero Sport GSR's bonnet is a 2.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The Pajero Sport has a 2.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine, which produces 133kW at 3500rpm and 430Nm at 2500rpm, and it has an eight-speed automatic transmission.
This is a respectable and well-proven combination, more than a bit sluggish and far from dynamic, but it does the job.
The GSR has Mitsubishi’s 'Super Select II' 4WD system and a rear diff lock.
All three test vehicles have hill descent control, hill-start assist and the like. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
There’s a Super Select II 4WD dial to the rear of the shifter, which enables the driver to switch from 2H (two-wheel drive), 4H (4WD high range), 4HLc (4WD High Range with locked centre diff), and 4LLC (4WD Low Range with locked centre diff).
The driver is able to safely switch between 2WD (2H) and 4WD (4H, 4HLc) at speeds up to 100km/h. I’m still old school enough to prefer to stop and switch, unless circumstances dictate otherwise.
The GSR has a button-operated off-road mode system – with Gravel, Mud/Snow, Sand or Rock settings, each of which tweaks engine output, transmission settings and traction control to best suit the terrain – and hill descent control. In fact, all have hill descent control, hill-start assist and the like.
Driving – What are they like to drive?
The Everest is an impressive off-roader and, in Sport grade, it's a vehicle well suited to an adventurous lifestyle.
The V6 is torquey, rarely stressed and it offers plenty of its 600Nm across a wide rev range.
The 10-speed auto transmission is cluey – most of the previous-gen’s scrambling between ratios has been ironed out – and if you want to take over duties yourself you can do so via the shifter.
That said, the so-called ‘e-Shifter’ in 4WD Everests is a mildly annoying toggle/rocker-switch that's a bit too fiddly for my liking, even though I eventually became used to it (read: grudgingly put up with it).
The Everest Sport is well suited to an adventurous lifestyle. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Low-range gearing is adequate and the Everest has an electronic rear diff lock for more dirt-grabbing control.
Driver-assist tech aimed at making 4WDing easier is plentiful and includes off-road driving modes such as Mud/Ruts and Sand, which seamlessly and effectively adjust engine outputs, throttle, transmission, braking, as well as traction and stability controls to best suit the driving conditions.
Also, the track-view/360-degree camera and vehicle-info read-out (displaying driveline/diff lock indicators, and steering, pitch and roll angles) – are nice features, but they’re more a novelty than a necessity.
The front camera, designed to offer the driver more ground-level visibility than you're afforded over the Everest’s huge bonnet, delivers a skewed fish-eye view of the track, and is adversely affected by the mix of bright sunlight and deep shadows of thick bushland.
The Everest has a listed length of 4914mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
Bonus: I’m now used to the front wheel track indicators on the screen and consider them a handy addition.
But all the tech wizardry combines to make the Everest almost too clever, almost too clinical in its execution, a bit too far removed in driving terms from its surroundings.
Hill descent control is quietly effective and, as it has shown in our recent Ranger tests, it again held the Everest to a safely controlled 3.0-4.0km/h while we tackled short but steep downhills at our 4WD testing grounds.
Size does matter when it comes to navigating a vehicle through thick bushland, and out in the rough stuff, bigger doesn’t always mean better.
The Everest's underbelly feels vulnerable. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Everest has a listed length of 4914mm (with a 2900mm wheelbase), a width of 2015mm, and a height of 1837mm. It has a turning circle of 11.8m and an official kerb weight is 2457kg.
So, this is not an insubstantial wagon to steer along narrow overgrown tracks.
And, ultimately, its dimensions are what prevent the Everest from being a real off-road beast. When you drive it you have to constantly be mindful of its size and drive accordingly, with a very careful and measured approach not required in more nimble 4WD wagons, such as the MU-X or Pajero Sport.
It feels low – even though official ground clearance is listed as 226mm – and its underbelly feels vulnerable.
The Everest's wading depth is 800mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Everest has a height of 1837mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The towbar impacts the Everest's departure angle. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
Careful and considered driving is necessary to avoid belly-scraping and sidestep run-ins while off-roading. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Everest's wheelbase especially, negatively affects its ability to traverse sharply-angled rock steps without experiencing undercarriage bumps or side-step scrapes.
Approach angle is 30.2 degrees, departure angle is 25 degrees, and ramp break-over is 21.9 degrees, but remember that if you fit a towbar to the rear that will impact the Everest’s departure angle.
Compromised off-road angles are not always a serious issue – and those can be negated to a degree with careful and considered driving, but they are far from ideal and if you want to avoid belly-scraping and sidestep run-ins with rock, tree stumps or grounded tree branches, then it's something to keep in mind.
Wading depth is 800mm and, while we punched it through a knee-deep mudhole four times, we never came close to challenging its water-crossing ability.
The Everest Sport's 20-inch alloy wheels are less desirable when 4WDing. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The Everest’s wheel travel – how far the axle can move up and down relative to the chassis – is probably the weakest of these three vehicles, as the other two in this test consistently dropped tyres closer to the dirt, or even to the dirt, on terrain where the Everest was left hanging.
Another strike against the Everest is the fact that, as standard, it has 20-inch alloy wheels with Goodyear Wrangler Territory HTs (255/55R20).
A 20-inch wheel-and-tyre combination is a no-no when 4WDing, with 18-, 17- or even 16-inch far more preferable.
A 20-inch tyre does not give the driver much flexibility in terms of how much air they can drop out of the tyre for off-roading – because there isn’t much tyre to start with!
The MU-X is a solid off-road tourer. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Also, when you start dropping air pressures in a 20-inch tyre, it impacts the vehicle’s running ground clearance, so making an already vulnerable undercarriage even more susceptible to damage.
To Ford’s credit, it does offer 18-inch black alloys on All-Terrain tyres as a no-cost option.
And even though the Everest’s standard tyres are described as “all-season”, they’re realistically not suited for anything beyond light-duty 4WDing.
As always, with most standard 4WDs, these kinds of problems – compromised off-road angles and less-than-ideal off-road tyres – can be addressed with a mild (two inch or so) aftermarket suspension lift and a good set of aggressive LT-construction all-terrain tyres.
The MU-X has a listed length of 4850mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
Another thing, the brake pedal feel spongy, taking a long time between initial foot pressure to actually 'biting', and then the brakes – discs all round – come into play quite abruptly.
Otherwise, I like the new Everest. It's nice to drive, comfortable and packed full of tech, but I reckon it's better suited to towing and recreational open-road or bush track duties than being used as a hard-core 4WD.
The MU-X is a solid off-road tourer. I’ve been critical of it in the past, saying the platform underpinning it is better suited to the D-Max than the MU-X. And I stand by that.
But the MU-X has proven itself to be more than capable of tackling serious 4WD challenges without flinching. The gap between suitability of platform for the D-Max and MU-X has narrowed, in the latter’s favour.
The MU-X tackled serious 4WD challenges with ease. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The punchy engine and six-speed auto work really well for low-speed, low-range off-roading.
As mentioned, while it’s not the torquiest engine in the 4WD wagon realm, there is plenty of torque on tap across a wide rev range. It never feels stressed, you can keep revs low and controlled and it ticks along nicely, getting the job done.
Low-range gearing is good, throttle response is tight – with a pedal that's not too sensitive when you’re traversing bumpy 4WD-only territory – and traction control has been recalibrated over previous-gens to exhibit a tighter effectiveness.
The MU-X's rear diff lock can be engaged at speeds up to 8.0km/h and only when you're in four-wheel drive low-range (4L).
The MU-X's wading depth is 800mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The MU-X has a height of 1825mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The MU-X's punchy engine and six-speed auto work well for low-speed, low-range off-roading. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
It will disengage when you hit 30km/h or more. Note: when you engage the diff lock, off-road traction control is disengaged. It's a handy addition that'll help to keep you moving on traction-compromised terrain and give you peace of mind on the tracks.
Hill descent control is impressive, holding our test vehicle to a controlled 3.0-4.0km/h while driving down our set-piece downhills.
The MU-X is 4850mm long (with a 2855mm wheelbase), 1870mm wide, and 1825mm high. It has a 11.4m turning circle.
The MU-X has approach, departure and ramp-over angles of 29.2 degrees, 26.4 degrees, and 23.1 degrees, respectively – all standard measurements for an unmodified 4WD wagon of this kind.
So, this is generally an impressive off-roader in stock-standard form, but there are a few trade-offs.
It has an official 235mm of ground clearance, but it still feels vulnerable at times to rubbing the earth with its undercarriage and pronounced side steps.
This low-riding sensation can be negated with slower, more considered driving, but can be more effectively resolved with an aftermarket suspension / lift if you plan to use your MU-X as an off-road tourer.
Wading depth is an official 800mm and while we punched it through our knee-deep mudhole four times – across and back, across and back – we never came close to seriously testing the MU-X’s water-crossing ability.
The Pajero Sport is a highly manoeuvrable 4WD on an ageing platform. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The MU-X’s wheel travel – how far the axle can move up and down relative to the chassis – was, by increments, probably the best of these three vehicles, stretching its tyres closest to the dirt, getting the most flex.
But a noticeable trade-off is its 20-inch wheel-and-tyre combination, which are far from ideal for 4WDing.
In order to make your MU-X even more effective off-road, buy a set of decent 18-inch all-terrains to replace its showroom-standard 265/50R20 Highway-Terrain tyres.
However, despite some of its admittedly minor flaws, the MU-X is still one of the best 4WD wagons on the market when it comes to difficult off-roading.
The Pajero Sport has a listed length of 4825mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Pajero Sport is a highly manoeuvrable 4WD on an ageing platform, but it carries its age pretty bloody well.
Official dimensions are listed as 4825mm long (with a 2800mm wheelbase), 1815mm wide, and 1835mm high. It has a 11m turning circle.
The Pajero Sport is the smallest in this trio and a very nimble and very capable off-roader, largely because you're able to tap into a few different ways engineered to help you to dominate tough low-range challenges.
First up, it has selectable off-road modes, including Gravel, Sand, Mud/Snow (when in high-range 4WD) and Rock (when in low-range 4WD).
The Pajero Sport is a very nimble and capable off-roader. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
All of those adjust engine output, transmission settings and braking, the aim being to produce superior traction to suit those specific conditions and terrains.
Next, it has decent high- and low-range gearing and a very effective Super Select II 4WD system.
Via a dial near the shifter, you can switch from 2H into 4H (four-wheel drive high-range), if you're not already driving with 4H engaged, and that gives you the best traction possible in low-traction conditions, which you may face on back-country roads and dirt tracks.
There's no risk of transmission wind-up because the centre diff is open when 4H is engaged in the Pajero Sport. It really does add an extra element of safety and sure-footedness to your driving experience.
The Pajero Sport has selectable off-road modes, including Gravel, Sand, Mud/Snow and Rock. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Pajero Sport has a height of 1835mm. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
The Pajero Sport is 1815mm wide. (Image: Jarryd Sullivan)
Then turn the dial to 4HLc (four-wheel drive high-range locked centre diff) and you're ready to take on more difficult terrain but at lower speeds, because the centre diff is no longer open.
If you're keen to tackle even harder stuff than high-range territory, turn the dial to 4LLc (four-wheel drive low-range locked centre diff) and the Pajero Sport has a real opportunity to excel in low-speed low-range four-wheel driving.
And, finally, as well as its centre diff-lock – which is activated when 4HLc (4WD high-range, locked centre diff) or 4LLc (4WD low-range, locked centre diff) is selected – the Pajero Sport has a rear diff lock, which is engaged/disengaged via a button in front of the shifter and this further help you to easily maintain a safe forward momentum.
Hill descent control works well, sustaining a controlled low speed all the way down every hill.
The Pajero Sport's tyres would perform better with more aggressive rubber. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Its riding on Toyo Open Country A32 all-terrain tyres (265/60R18 110H) and while they’re preferable in off-road terms to the 20-inch wheel-and-tyre packages on the other two vehicles in this test, it would perform even better with more aggressive rubber.
Wheel travel is good, although not the best in this trio, ground clearance (218mm) is pretty good, although you still have to mind your driving line through rough terrain and be mindful of approach, departure and ramp-over angles.
All-round, the Pajero Sport is an effective off-road package, and does everything in a safe and controlled way.
All of these vehicles are well catered for in terms of accessories, including a wide range available from the carmakers themselves and also from Australia’s thriving aftermarket industry – think bullbars, nudge bars, snorkels, towbar kits, cargo barriers and the like.
Efficiency – What is their fuel consumption? What are their driving ranges?
As always, each vehicle was loaded in exactly the same way (with the same two people onboard) and driven over the same off-road loop in the same manner in the same conditions and on appropriate tyre pressures.
Official fuel consumption for the Everest V6 is 8.5L/100km on a combined cycle.
Its real-world fuel figure on this test, from pump to pump, was 20.3L/100km.
Each test vehicle was driven in the same conditions and on appropriate tyre pressures. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The Everest has a 80-litre tank, so, going by the above figures, you will have a touring distance (spent mostly in low-range 4WD) of about 360km – that’s after taking out a 30km safe-distance buffer.
Official fuel consumption for the MU-X LS-T 4x4 is 8.3L/100km on a combined cycle.
We recorded 10.2L/100km, from pump to pump, during 4WD testing.
The MU-X has a 80-litre tank, so, going by the above figure, you will have a low-range touring distance of about 750km – that figure is minus a 30km safe-distance buffer.
The Everest and MU-X have 80-litre tanks and the Pajero Sport has a 68-litre tank. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
Official fuel consumption for the Pajero Sport GSR is 8.0L/100km on a combined cycle.
Its real-world fuel figure on this test, from pump to pump, was 9.4L/100km.
The Pajero Sport has a 68-litre tank, so, with that sort of fuel-consumption figure, you can reasonably expect a driving range of approximately 690km from a full tank, but that’s after having already factored in a safe-distance buffer of 30km.
Safety – What safety equipment is fitted? What is their safety ratings?
It has nine airbags (dual front, front side, driver and passenger knee airbags, curtain airbags for both rows and a centre front airbag to prevent head collisions) and a full suite of driver-assist tech including front AEB (autonomous emergency braking), adaptive cruise control with speed sign recognition and speed adaptation, lane departure alert and lane keep assist, and blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.
The Everest’s AEB operates up to 130km/h, with pedestrian and cyclist detection operating up to 80km/h, according to Ford.
It also has reverse brake assist (rear AEB), a tyre pressure monitoring system, a 360-degree surround-view camera, front and rear parking sensors, and an auto parking system.
The MY23 Pajero Sport is yet to be ANCAP tested/rated. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The MU-X range has the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing in 2020.
It has eight airbags (including a knee and front centre airbag) and driver-assist tech such as AEB, adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, lane departure prevention, traffic sign recognition, and a reversing camera with rear cross traffic alert.
The second-row seat has three child-seat anchorage points and one ISOFIX point each on the left and right seats.
The MU-X’s AEB “operates at a vehicle speed of approximately 8.0km/h or less or approximately 160km/h or more", according to the factory owner's manual.
The system, with 'Turn Assist', detects vehicles (cars and motorbikes), pedestrians and cyclists.
The Everest and MU-X have a five-star ANCAP safety rating (tested in 2022 and 2020 respectively). (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The MY22 Pajero Sport (driven in this test) has the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing in 2015. The MY23 Pajero Sport has not yet been ANCAP tested or rated.
Safety gear includes seven airbags (driver’s knee, driver and passenger front, driver and passenger front sides, and curtains) and this Pajero Sport’s suite of active safety and driver-assist tech includes AEB, adaptive cruise control, trailer stability assist, rear view camera and rear parking sensors, blind-spot warning with lane change assist, and rear cross-traffic alert.
The Pajero Sport’s AEB has a ‘AEB City’ classification, which denotes that it is a system which only “operates at lower speeds (usually between 10-50km/h)”, according to ANCAP.
It does not operate at higher speeds (“50-250km/h”), and it does not detect vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, or motorcyclists, when it is travelling at speeds of more than 50km/h.
The second-row seat has three child-seat anchorage points and an ISOFIX point on each outboard seat.
Ownership – What warranty is offered? What are their service intervals? What are their running costs?
Service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km and the maintenance cost for the first 48 months/60,000km (the first four services) is capped at $329 a pop for MY22 or MY23 Everests.
The Everest is covered by Ford's five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The MU-X has a six-year/150,000km warranty and seven years of roadside assistance. That warranty is okay in terms of years, but unlimited km would be a welcome sweetener.
Service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs soonest.
Capped price servicing covers the first seven scheduled services (or up to seven years/105,000km, whichever occurs first) for 19MY and later vehicles.
The cost per service is $409 at 12 months/15,000km, $429 at 24 months/30,000km, $629 at 36 months/45,000km, $529 at 48 months/60,000km, $319 at 60 months/75,000km, $769 at 72 months/90,000km, and $429 at 84 months/105,000km – for a total cost of $3513, according to Isuzu.
The MU-X is covered of Isuzu's six-year/150,000km warranty. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
The Pajero Sport is covered by a 10-year/200,000 kilometre new car warranty, (whichever occurs first and when all scheduled services are completed at a Mitsubishi Dealership), 10 years of capped price servicing, and four years of roadside assistance.
Service intervals are set for 12 months or 15,000km, and capped price servicing covers the first 10 regular services at those scheduled 15,000km/12 month intervals.
The average cost per service (over 10 years) is $599 a time – and that’s been calculated by CarsGuide’s crack team of expert bean-counters.
The Pajero Sport is covered by Mitsubishi's 10-year/200,000 kilometre warranty. (Image: Glen Sullivan)
When all is said and done, not a lot separates these three vehicles in terms of being able to safely take on serious 4WD challenges in stock-standard form. However, there are minor differences in how comfortably capable they are – that is, how well they are able to traverse tough terrain with minimal stress, all the while avoiding damage.
Ultimately, minuscule differences in efficacy separate these three vehicles – but, for my money, the MU-X was the most effective 4WD on this test.
Isuzu’s 4WD wagon, built on the D-Max platform, never stopped impressing off-road – with a tractable engine and effective driver-assist tech – and it’s only ever hampered in its efforts by its underbody vulnerability and its 20-inch road-biased tyres.
The V6 Everest is a very capable off-roader and benefits from a stack of driver-assist tech. If this were a test to find the best all-round vehicle here, then the Everest would likely win outright because it’s the most refined vehicle, but this was about low-range prowess.
The Pajero Sport lands in a close third. It’s very capable when tackling 4WD challenges, but it’s all packaged on an ageing platform – and the smallest of margins force the Mitsubishi to the rear of this pack.
Likes
MU-X is very capable off-road
Everest makes good use of driver-driver-assist tech
Disclaimer: The pricing information shown in the editorial content (Review Prices) is to be used as a guide only and is based on information provided to Carsguide Autotrader Media Solutions Pty Ltd (Carsguide) both by third party sources and the car manufacturer at the time of publication. The Review Prices were correct at the time of publication. Carsguide does not warrant or represent that the information is accurate, reliable, complete, current or suitable for any particular purpose. You should not use or rely upon this information without conducting an independent assessment and valuation of the vehicle.